Observing conditions · Planets · Deep sky

Seeing and transparency: why the planets shimmer

Two different things make a night good or bad for observing. Seeing is how steady the air is, and it decides how much detail you see on the planets and double stars. Transparency is how clear the air is, and it decides how faint a galaxy or nebula you can see. The best nights for one are often poor for the other.

Starlight arrives as flat wavefronts Turbulent cells of warm and cool air bend the light Wavefronts reach the telescope rippled Steady air: sharp disk and rings Turbulent air: a boiling blur The same star, same telescope

Swipe sideways to see the full diagram.

Moving pockets of warm and cool air act like weak, shifting lenses. Through a telescope they turn a star's sharp diffraction pattern into a blur and make Jupiter look as if it is under running water.

Seeing is turbulence in the air between you and the star

Seeing is the blurring and dancing of a star's image caused by turbulence in Earth's atmosphere. Air at different temperatures bends light by slightly different amounts. As pockets of warm and cool air drift across the telescope, they bend the light one way and then another, many times a second.

To the naked eye the result is twinkling. In a telescope at high power a star becomes a shivering blob, and the edge of the Moon or Jupiter ripples. Turbulence comes from three layers:

  • High altitude: the jet stream, 30,000 to 40,000 ft up, brings the worst seeing when it passes overhead. Forecasts show where it is.
  • Near the ground: heat rising from pavement, roofs, decks and nearby houses after a warm day. Observing over grass or water helps; looking over a rooftop does not.
  • Inside the telescope: a warm mirror or lens heats the air in the tube and makes its own turbulence, called tube currents. A large telescope needs 30 minutes to two hours outside to cool; Schmidt-Cassegrains and Maksutovs, with closed tubes, are slowest.

Seeing, not aperture, limits detail beyond about 5 inches on most nights

A telescope's theoretical resolving power is about 116 divided by its aperture in millimeters, in arcseconds (the Dawes limit). Turbulence sets its own limit, measured as the width of a star's blurred image. Whichever is larger wins. Numbers below are the finest detail each telescope shows, in arcseconds; "(air)" marks where the air, not the telescope, is the limit.

Finest detail by aperture and seeing, arcseconds
TelescopeDawes limitExcellent (0.5)Good (1)Average (2)Poor (3)
80 mm refractor (80 mm)1.451.41.42.0 (air)3.0 (air)
4-inch (102 mm)1.141.11.12.0 (air)3.0 (air)
6-inch (150 mm)0.770.81.0 (air)2.0 (air)3.0 (air)
8-inch (203 mm)0.570.61.0 (air)2.0 (air)3.0 (air)
10-inch (254 mm)0.460.5 (air)1.0 (air)2.0 (air)3.0 (air)
12-inch (305 mm)0.380.5 (air)1.0 (air)2.0 (air)3.0 (air)
16-inch (406 mm)0.290.5 (air)1.0 (air)2.0 (air)3.0 (air)

On an average night of 2-arcsecond seeing, every telescope from an 80 mm refractor up shows about the same detail. A big telescope still gathers more light, so the planets look brighter and show more color, and on the rare excellent night it shows far more.

Astronomers describe turbulence with the Fried parameter, r0: the width of a column of air that stays steady enough to act as one piece. A telescope smaller than r0 sees a sharp image that wanders; one larger than r0 sees a blur. Image blur is about 0.98 times the wavelength divided by r0:

r0 (green light)Star blur (arcsec)What it is like
3 cm3.7Poor: stars boil, planets show little
5 cm2.2Below average
10 cm1.1Good: most fine planetary detail shows
15 cm0.7Very good
20 cm0.6Excellent: a few nights a year at most sites

The Pickering scale rates seeing from 1 to 10 by what a star looks like

William Pickering devised his scale at Harvard in the early 1900s using a small refractor. Defocus nothing; just look at a bright star at high power and compare:

PickeringThe star at high powerGood for
1 to 2A boiling blob about twice the size of the outer diffraction ring; no rings visibleWide-field and deep-sky observing only
3 to 4A blob with occasional glimpses of rings; the disk rarely seenThe Moon at low power, bright planets in outline
5The central disk shows; rings broken and movingJupiter's main belts, Saturn's rings
6 to 7Disk sharp most of the time, inner ring completeFine planetary detail, close double stars
8 to 9Disk and rings steady, with brief motionThe best planetary views; splitting pairs at the Dawes limit
10A perfect, motionless diffraction patternRare anywhere

Transparency is how clear the air is, and it decides how faint you can see

Transparency is how much light the air lets through. Water vapor, haze, dust and wildfire smoke scatter and absorb starlight, dimming faint objects and brightening the sky background. Transparency matters most for galaxies, nebulae and the Milky Way, whose light is faint and spread out. It matters little for the planets, which are bright.

You can judge it with the naked eye. Find the faintest star you can see near the zenith (the point overhead) and compare with a chart: that is your limiting magnitude, which combines transparency and light pollution. A clear-blue daytime sky to the horizon usually means a transparent night; a milky-white sky means haze.

Steady hazy nights suit the planets; crisp windy nights suit galaxies

Seeing and transparency often work against each other. After a cold front passes, the air is dry and very clear, but fast winds aloft make it turbulent. A warm, still, slightly hazy night under high pressure can bring the steadiest air of the season.

The nightSeeingTransparencyObserve
Just after a cold front: crisp, windy, deep-blue skyPoorExcellentGalaxies, nebulae, the Milky Way
Still, humid, slightly hazy, stars barely twinklingGood to excellentPoor to fairJupiter, Saturn, Mars, the Moon, double stars
Calm and dry under high pressureGoodGoodEverything
Wildfire smoke or dust aloftOften goodPoorThe Moon and planets

A quick test: if the bright stars near the horizon are twinkling hard, seeing is poor. If stars overhead shine with a steady light, try high power on a planet.

Astronomy forecasts predict seeing and transparency hour by hour

General weather apps forecast cloud but not seeing or transparency. Several free services built for astronomers do:

  • Clear Outside (from First Light Optics, UK): hourly cloud at three heights, transparency and moon phase, as a website and app.
  • Astrospheric (Canada): seeing and transparency maps from the Canadian Meteorological Centre models, best for North America.
  • Meteoblue astronomy seeing (Switzerland): seeing in arcseconds, jet stream speed and bad layers in the atmosphere.
  • Xasteria: an iPhone app combining several forecast models.

Use them to pick the target for the night: planets when the seeing forecast is good, galaxies when transparency is.